I read my first
book by Mary Stewart in the summer between the fifth and sixth grades: The
Crystal Cave, the first book in her famous Merlin Trilogy.
Her novel opened
my eyes to many things, to the notion that an author could build a credible mythological
narrative based on actual historical antecedents for Camelot and King Arthur,
subjects that at the age of eleven I was already fascinated with. Though, until
I read Mary Stewart I thought of the Knights of the Roundtable as belonging to
the world of make-believe, like Hercules, or Sinbad, I thought of them as fantastical,
not pure fantasy like Gandalf and Bilbo Baggins, but nearer to them than they
were to Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar or Genghis Khan.
Mary Stewart wrote
her trilogy (and then a fourth book) from the perspective of Merlin; she set
the timeline in the fifth century CE, when Roman influence was waning in the
British Isles, her books linked the rise of the Arthurian kingdom to a Roman
dynasty, a ruling elite that had adopted the local customs and had become
syncretized to their cultural norms, a group of so-called Gallo Romans who
lived among Celtic and Brithonic people among whom were the Welsh, the
Scots and the Picts.
She wrote about
the Roman Army, thereby introducing me to the Cult of Mithras, Sol Invictus; in
writing about these Celts, otherwise known as the Gaul, she wrote about an
ancient culture whose sphere of influence included Ireland and the British
Isles, all of France and Spain. She wrote about this Indo-European culture that
once covered the continents of Eurasia from the Iceland to Sri Lanka…and she
wrote about the Druids, she wrote about their myths and legends. She peeled
away the most fantastical elements associated with their place in Celtic
culture, leaving me to wonder if what was left, even the magic might be real.
The figures in her
stories, Uther Pendragon, Merlin, Igraine and Arthur were presented with a kind
of grittiness that made me believe in them as if they were real people. They
were already mythic figures in my imagination, but through her narrative they became
tangible and my connection to them grew.
Through Mary
Stewart’s presentation of Mithraism, because of its connections to the early
Christian movement, I came to be interested in the real history of Church, I became
a researcher, and I began to question everything that I had been told.
I cannot thank her
enough for this.
Mary Stewart had
an oversized influence on my life, though I did go further in her body of work than
the Merlin Trilogy. At that time in my life and for years to come I read
everything I could get my hands on concerning King Arthur, including Mallory’s,
the La Morte de Artur, and all of the variations of that text which
flowed from it.
All of those
readings were conditioned by Mary Stewart’s historicity.
From Mary Stewart
I learned about many other things:
I discovered the
real presence of Arthurian myth in European culture, serving as a force major,
as a beacon of hope, providing my forebears with a set or mores and a code of
conduct that initiated and fostered the chivalric ideal, while becoming a
vehicle for the subversion of any state that did not live up to the ideal.
Arthurian myth provided
a foundation for the Albigensian and Waldensian Herseies, and
other counter cultural movements around the turn of the tenth century. Such
movements were supported by the agency of people known as troubadours,
travelling poets and minstrels who seemed to be cast in the mode of the
bardic-druid.
My early exposure
to Mary Stewart gave me a proper frame of reference to comprehend Joseph
Campbell’s discussion of Arthurian Myth, which then became an entry point for
my understanding of the hero’s journey and to mythology in general, providing
me with a frame of reference by which to study the literature, history and
philosophies of the church.
If I had not read
Mary Stewart I may never have become a theologian, if my interest in those
things had not been piqued by her authorship, I would not be the person I am
today…she is a hero of mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I am very interested in your commentary, please respond to anything that interests you.